National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
NIAID Home Health & Science Research Funding Research News & Events Labs at NIAID About NIAID

NIAID Research Funding

NIAID Funding News
icon Subscribe to Alerts
Editorial Board
News Links
Opportunities and Announcements
Budget and Funding
Grants
Contracts
Standard Operating Procedures
Questions and Answers
Advisory Council
Glossary of Funding and Policy Terms
Find It! A-Z
Latest Updates

Graphic: NIAID Funding News

March 13, 2007

News Articles

Opportunities and Resources

Advice Corner

New Funding Opportunities

News Articles
Separator line

Level Budgets on the Horizon Next Fiscal Year

Expect a flat funding line again in FY 2008, which begins this October 1. Funding policies for FY 2008 apply to new and competing applications submitted for the September or October 2007 Council round.

The President's Budget requests $28.85 billion for NIH and $4.59 billion for NIAID, which includes a $300 million pass-through for the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.

Excluding the pass-through, NIAID's budget grows only 0.2 percent from FY 2007. Though the President's Budget request is only the first step in the budget cycle, we do not expect to see major increases next fiscal year.

Other features of the President's Budget are as follows:

  • Support for 10,188 competing research project grants, 566 more than the FY 2007 estimate, and 1,060 more than in FY 2006.
  • Average cost for competing research project grants at the FY 2007 estimate level.
  • No inflationary increases for noncompeting research project grants unless NIH already committed to them.
  • Increase of $24 million or 1.4 percent over the FY 2007 estimate for other research programs, including $31 million for Pathway to Independence Awards (K99/R00).
  • $78 million for the Superfund Research Program and $150 million for the Type I Diabetes Initiative.
  • Support for the Roadmap at a slightly lower level than originally planned. For general information, go to New Roadmap Initiatives for 2008.
  • Continued support for the Genes and Environment Initiative.

Read a Summary of the FY 2008 President’s Request and NIAID's Justification Narrative for FY 2008 President's Budget for NIAID.

For all IC payline information, go to FY 2007 Funding Strategies on the NIH Financial Operations Web site.

Separator line

Welcome Five New Council Members

We'd like to welcome the new members of our main advisory body, the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Subcommittee

  • Robert Brooks, M.D., associate dean for health affairs and professor of family medicine and rural health at the Florida State University College of Medicine in Tallahassee.
  • Satya Dandekar, Ph.D., professor and chair of the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of California, Davis.

Allergy and Immunology (DAIT) Subcommittee

  • Sharon C. Kiely, M.D., M.P.M., medical director for quality and patient safety at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh and associate professor of medicine at Drexel University School of Medicine in Philadelphia.
  • Marc E. Rothenberg, M.D., Ph.D., professor of pediatrics and director of the Division of Allergy and Immunology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and director of the Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders.
  • David S. Wilkes, M.D., Dr. Calvin H. English Professor of Medicine, Microbiology, and Immunology at the Indiana University School of Medicine.

For bios and pictures, go to NIAID Council Members, Biographical Sketches on our Council page.

Separator line

New Congressional Lineup

With the switch to Democratic control of Congress, committees that affect NIH have new chairs and ranking minority members. Congress authorizes us to pursue our mission and appropriates tax money to fund research.

Here are the Congressional committees most important to us.

Senate

House of Representatives

For more on the budget cycle, see pages starting with the NIAID Funding Opportunity Planning and the Budget Cycle in the Grant Application Basics tutorial.

Opportunities and Resources
Separator line

Use Our Checklists When Writing Your Application

Here's an efficient way to learn the ins and outs of writing an NIH grant application: go directly to our newly updated Checklists for the NIH Grant Cycle.

At a fraction of the size of the All About Grants tutorials, the Checklists feature short bulleted lists that have the important requirements and pitfalls you'll need to know. Each checklist section now links to the relevant All About Grants pages in case you want more detail.

And you may want to check out our expanded Checklists for Planning and Writing a Human Subjects Grant Application.

Advice Corner
Separator line

Grants.gov Correction Window Extended to March 14

Due to delays in Grants.gov, NIH is giving people applying for the March 5 receipt date till March 14 to correct errors from either Grants.gov or eRA Commons validation.

NIH sent a notice to this effect to everyone on its Listserv, and you may have seen the slowness alert on Grants.gov and on the NIH Electronic Submission site.

Separator line

When Grants.gov Is Slow

Regular procedures ensure that you are not penalized for Grants.gov processing delays. To be on time, your application must have a time stamp by 5:00 p.m. local time on the due date.

Grants.gov immediately gives your application a time stamp and tracking number after your authorized organizational representative submits it. Any processing after that does not affect the submission time.

It's not just NIH applicants, but also those from other agencies who can bog down Grants.gov's resources. Apply early to avoid crunch times. There may be overlapping submission dates you don't know about.

Once you're in, it can take up to 48 hours for your submission get through validations, and Grants.gov's Contact Center wants you to wait that much time before requesting help.

Separator line

Reader Questions

Oscar E. Suman, assistant professor, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, asks:

“Does resubmitting an application remove an existing scored application from being considered at the Council meeting?”

Yes. A resubmission of a scored application automatically withdraws the original application. However, NIAID does reactivate the original application if we can award it. This may happen if NIAID increases its payline at the end of the fiscal year.

For advice on resubmitting, see How to Revise and Resubmit in the NIH Grant Cycle: Application to Renewal.

Charisma D. Edwards, electrical engineering doctoral student, Louisiana State University, asks:

“How can a doctoral student write a relevant biographical sketch?"

We recommend using the biosketch from your mentor’s grant application as an example. Remember that your biosketch cannot exceed four pages and should include:

  1. Positions and honors.
  2. Selected peer-reviewed publications or manuscripts in press.
  3. Research support.

As a doctoral student, we do not expect you to have extensive experience in publications. You should add all three section headers whether or not you have information for that area.

Read more about biosketches at Senior/Key Person Profile Form: Prepare the Biographical Sketches in the NIH Grant Cycle: Application to Renewal.

Sungeun Lee, research assistant, Center for Mental Health Policy and Services Research, asks:

"Will NIH funding support foreign postdoctoral fellows?"

Foreign postdoc fellows may work on NIH-funded research grants, but they may not work on an NRSA fellowship or training grant.

According to the NIH Grants Policy Statement, PIs and others supported by NIH research grants are usually not required to be U.S. citizens, though some programs have citizenship requirements. 

Check the program announcement or request for applications to be sure. If you plan to work with select agents, see our Foreign Workers on NIH Awards SOP. Also read Part 1. Qualifying for a Grant and International Awards questions and answers.

Jarrod Provins, scientist, Ionian Technologies Inc., asks:

"Do academic institutions or for-profit organizations more often get NIAID Cooperative Research Partnerships awards?"

NIAID awarded 44 cooperative research partnership awards in FY 2006.  For-profit organizations won 16 of these awards, and the majority of the remaining awards were won by academic institutions who subcontract work to for-profit firms.

New Funding Opportunities
Separator line

See these and older announcements on our NIH Funding Opportunities Relevant to NIAID.

Search in Research Funding

Look It Up

See the Glossary for terms.