See the Glossary for more terms.
Table of Contents
Our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding tutorial is a good place to start. For more detailed information and advice on writing an application, check out our Strategy for NIH Funding.
To see examples of exceptional funded applications, go to Sample Applications and Summary Statements on Samples and Examples.
Find these resources on our New and Early-Stage Investigators portal. NIH also has a New Investigators page.
See Are You "New"? in our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding.
NIH uses the information you enter in your Commons profile. Read more in Are You "New"?
No. Your being an investigator (listed as key personnel) on another person's grant would not jeopardize your status as a new or early-stage investigator. That status counts only for the PI, not key personnel.
Yes. As a project leader on a P01, you are not a PI, so you are still eligible to be a new investigator.
Yes. If you are appointed as PI but weren't listed as the PI on the original application, NIH would still consider you to be a new investigator when it's time to apply for your own R01.
Read more on the NIH definition at Are You "New"? in our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding tutorial.
No. NIH recognizes as program director/principal investigator (PD/PI) only those who are listed as such on the Notice of Award. The same would apply in the case of a multiple PI (MPI) award—only those who are listed as PDs/PIs as part of an MPI application jeopardize losing their new investigator status.
Read Definition of New Investigator to learn more.
Yes. Only NIH grants affect your status as a new or early-stage investigator. For more explanation, see Are You "New"?
See Is the R21 a good option for a new PI? in Small and Exploratory/Developmental Research Grants questions and answers.
Yes, you would still be considered new. For more information, see Are You "New"?
No. A subcontractor is not the official NIH PI for a grant. For more information on new PI status, go to Are You "New"?
As soon as you get your first R01, your status changes in the NIH grants database, and you are no longer a new investigator. If you already submitted a second application as a new investigator, the database will automatically update your status after your first award.
See If I replace another investigator as PI on a resubmission, will my new investigator status be affected? in our Resubmission of Unfunded Applications questions and answers.
When submitting a multiple PI application, you are not new or early-stage unless all the other PIs also meet NIH's Definition of New Investigator, which we explain in Are You "New"?
For caveats and advice, read Should You Consider a Multiple PI Application? in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
Read our advice in Should You Consider a Multiple PI Application? in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
A multiple PI grant application will be flagged for ESI status only if all principal investigators listed are ESIs. The policy for ESIs on multiple PI applications is parallel to the situation for new investigators. See the Definition of New Investigator.
Not necessarily. You should request the amount appropriate to your research and career level. Talk to your institution and a program officer for advice. Do not choose the award type yourself.
Get program officer contact information at see Contact Staff for Help. For more information, read these pages in our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding:
Yes. If you are a new investigator and your outstanding R01 application misses the payline, you would be more likely to get an R56-Bridge or selective pay award than more experienced investigators would.
For more information, see the Selective Pay SOP, the NIAID R56-Bridge Award SOP, and Contact Your Program Officer to Learn Your Funding Options in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
In some respects, yes. In evaluating applications, peer reviewers look more at potential than achievement. However, you'll still need the recources and experience to do the work. See Creating Your Application in our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding.
No. Reviewers may know much more about your field than you do. You should not put anything in the application that's not directly relevant. See Creating Your Application for ideas on how to impress reviewers.
Read Know Your Audience in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
No. They will be more impressed if you bring in collaborators to fill gaps in your expertise and resources. It helps to choose a mentor or collaborators who are well known and respected since reviewers may recognize their names.
In our New Investigator Guide to NIH Funding, see Getting Oriented, and for training and career awards, see Before Applying, Choose a Good Mentor. For general advice, read Design a Project in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
Yes. You have at least a month between receiving your summary statement and the resubmission deadline. However, that timeframe may not give you enough time to prepare. Read Timing Factors That Affect Your Application and Award in the Strategy for NIH Funding.
No. NIAID awards research supplements to existing research grants. The grantee applies, not the person receiving the support. We offer Diversity, Primary Caregiver, and Reentry supplements. For more information, go to Research Supplements on our Training and Career portal.
NIAID supports Training Awards, Fellowships, and Career Development Awards. For more information, see our Advice on Research Training and Career Awards tutorial and the Training and Career Awards main page.
See How can I receive email messages from NIAID about funding and other news? in our Finding Help questions and answers.
Email firstname.lastname@example.org with the title of this page or its URL and your question or comment. We answer questions by email and post them here. Thanks for helping us clarify and expand our knowledge base.
Last Updated May 04, 2015
Last Reviewed June 27, 2012