Skip Navigation

Research Funding

Skip Content Marketing
  • Share this:
  • submit to facebook
  • Tweet it
  • submit to reddit
  • submit to StumbleUpon
  • submit to Google +

Know What to Look for When Choosing a Mentor

To help you pick the right mentor for your fellowship or career development award, here are some points to consider.

Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list, so we recommend you check the Related Links below and find other resources, e.g., people at your institution that can help you select a mentor who's right for you.

Note: We use mentor in the singular, but you are not limited to having just one. In fact, if you can't find one person who can meet all your needs, you may want to consider creating a mentoring team. Also, for some projects, you may need two mentors—check the program announcement for details.

Table of Contents

First Things First: What Is a Mentor?

A mentor is someone who makes a long-term commitment to your career. He or she wears many hats—adviser, advocate, critic, instructor—to guide your research and help you with your professional development and advancement.

As for what a mentor does, NIH's Office of Intramural Training and Education offers a good summary:

A good mentor will help you define your research goals, and then support you in your quest to achieve them. He or she will share knowledge, provide encouragement, and hopefully inspire you. In addition to promoting your research, your mentor should help you to develop your career goals and construct a scientific network. Above all, your mentor should be someone you trust to always keep your best interest in mind.—from Thoughts on Choosing a Research Mentor (linked below)

Qualities of a Good Mentor

Ideally, a mentor should be an active investigator with independent funding, well known, and well respected in your selected field as well as have essential qualities like being knowledgeable, open-minded, supportive, motivating, and a good listener.

He or she must be able to communicate clearly, give you appropriate projects to pursue, teach you to analyze and interpret results, as well as determine alternative paths.

Additionally, a good mentor should:

  • Foster collaboration.
  • Ensure you're making progress towards goals.
  • Give you feedback on your scientific work in a constructive and timely manner.
  • Support your participation in career-building activities, e.g., retreats, grant writing.
  • Encourage you to be independent, for example, in designing and conducting experiments.
  • Introduce you to researchers in your field at meetings or conferences.
  • Acknowledge your contribution to the research, for example, through authorship on publications.
  • Help you with grant applications and review them before you submit.

Keep in mind that a principal investigator (PI) doesn't have to meet all the criteria above to be a good mentor.

Do Your Homework

You probably won't know whether a potential mentor has the aforementioned traits until you start working together, which is why you'll want to do your homework before approaching someone to take on this important role.

Talk to other students, postdocs, or research assistants to get their feedback on whether the PI has the qualities listed above. Ask them if they receive enough direction, feedback, and advice, and if they find the PI accessible and available. This is key since one who is frequently away or too busy to answer questions or resolve issues won't be of much help to you. Be aware that eminent, established researchers are often absent from the lab—and peer reviewers who evaluate your grant application will know that.

As another part of your homework, search for papers that the PI has published. This way, you get the following:

  • An idea of whether your research interests match. If your mentor's expertise doesn't complement your area of investigation, your grant application could suffer during peer review.
  • A sense of his or her publication record, which should preferably show that the PI actively publishes in high-quality journals.

In addition to the PI's publication record, ask about his or her training record. Reviewers will expect to see a solid one that includes past trainees who have progressed to significant scientific careers.

Another key element to consider: the PI's funding situation. Since a fellowship or K award doesn't provide a substantial amount of money for research supplies, your mentor should be well-funded.

Final Thoughts

Selecting a mentor is a personal choice. Only you can get a sense of whether someone will meet your expectations and be able to guide your development as an independent researcher.

As we mentioned at the outset, we encourage you to find resources of your own and talk to others about potential mentors you have in mind. The more legwork you do, the better your chances of finding the right fit.

Related Links

NIH

NIAID

Career Toolkit: Mentoring

The "Right" Postdoc Mentor

How to Get the Mentoring You Want: A Guide for Graduate Students at a Diverse University

Last Updated May 09, 2014

Last Reviewed May 09, 2014