To help you pick the right mentor for your fellowship or career development award, here are some points to consider.
Keep in mind that this is by no means an exhaustive list, so we recommend you check the Related Links below and find other resources, e.g., people at your institution that can help you select a mentor who's right for you.
Note: We use mentor in the singular, but you are not limited to having just one. In fact, if you can't find one person who can meet all your needs, you may want to consider creating a mentoring team. Also, for some projects, you may need two mentors—check the program announcement for details.
A mentor is someone who makes a long-term commitment to your career. He or she wears many hats—adviser, advocate, critic, instructor—to guide your research and help you with your professional development and advancement.
As for what a mentor does, NIH's Office of Intramural Training and Education offers a good summary:
A good mentor will help you define your research goals, and then support you in your quest to achieve them. He or she will share knowledge, provide encouragement, and hopefully inspire you. In addition to promoting your research, your mentor should help you to develop your career goals and construct a scientific network. Above all, your mentor should be someone you trust to always keep your best interest in mind.—from Thoughts on Choosing a Research Mentor (linked below)
Ideally, a mentor should be an active investigator with independent funding, well known, and well respected in your selected field as well as have essential qualities like being knowledgeable, open-minded, supportive, motivating, and a good listener.
He or she must be able to communicate clearly, give you appropriate projects to pursue, teach you to analyze and interpret results, as well as determine alternative paths.
Additionally, a good mentor should:
Keep in mind that a principal investigator (PI) doesn't have to meet all the criteria above to be a good mentor.
You probably won't know whether a potential mentor has the aforementioned traits until you start working together, which is why you'll want to do your homework before approaching someone to take on this important role.
Talk to other students, postdocs, or research assistants to get their feedback on whether the PI has the qualities listed above. Ask them if they receive enough direction, feedback, and advice, and if they find the PI accessible and available. This is key since one who is frequently away or too busy to answer questions or resolve issues won't be of much help to you. Be aware that eminent, established researchers are often absent from the lab—and peer reviewers who evaluate your grant application will know that.
As another part of your homework, search for papers that the PI has published. This way, you get the following:
In addition to the PI's publication record, ask about his or her training record. Reviewers will expect to see a solid one that includes past trainees who have progressed to significant scientific careers.
Another key element to consider: the PI's funding situation. Since a fellowship or K award doesn't provide a substantial amount of money for research supplies, your mentor should be well-funded.
Selecting a mentor is a personal choice. Only you can get a sense of whether someone will meet your expectations and be able to guide your development as an independent researcher.
As we mentioned at the outset, we encourage you to find resources of your own and talk to others about potential mentors you have in mind. The more legwork you do, the better your chances of finding the right fit.
Career Toolkit: Mentoring
Mentoring Plans for Postdoctoral Scholars
How to Get the Mentoring You Want: A Guide for Graduate Students at a Diverse University
Last Updated November 03, 2015
Last Reviewed November 03, 2015