Because of a lapse in government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted.

Updates regarding government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at

Two Genetic Markers that Predict Malaria Treatment Failure Found

November 3, 2016

A frontline malaria treatment that combines fast-acting dihydroartemisinin with long-lasting piperaquine is quickly losing power in Cambodia due to the rapid spread of drug-resistant parasites. The presence of piperaquine-resistant malaria parasites in several Cambodian provinces was confirmed earlier this year by National Institutes of Health researchers and their colleagues. Now, by comparing the complete genomes of 297 parasites isolated from Cambodian malaria patients to a reference malaria parasite genome, the team has identified two genetic markers that are strongly associated with the parasites’ ability to resist piperaquine.

A simple test, performed after collecting blood from a finger pinprick, can show whether a malaria patient has parasites with the genetic markers. If so, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine therapy is likely to fail, say the study authors, and an alternative drug combination (artesunate-mefloquine) should be used. Information about the distribution of these drug resistance markers is being used by officials in Cambodia and neighboring countries to map the extent and spread of piperaquine resistance and to help guide region-wide malaria treatment approaches.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) scientist Rick Fairhurst, M.D., Ph.D., and Roberto Amato, Ph.D., of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (WTSI), Cambridge, UK, led the research team. The first marker they identified is a change of one subunit in a gene on the parasite’s chromosome 13. Parasites with this genetic change are much more likely to be resistant to piperaquine than parasites without it. The marker, while associated with drug resistance, likely does not play a functional role in enabling parasites to resist piperaquine, according to the researchers. In contrast, the second resistance marker identified by the investigators may have such a role. That marker is an increased number of copies of two genes (plasmepsin II and plasmepsin III) in those parasites that resist piperaquine. Malaria parasites use plasmepsins to help them digest human blood and, although the exact mechanism of action of piperaquine is not known, it is believed that the drug targets plasmepsins. Parasite
s may react to piperaquine by increasing plasmepsin production, and any parasites with extra copies of the plasmepsin II and III genes may be better able to withstand piperaquine treatment. Of note, parasites with increased piperaquine resistance appear to have increased susceptibility to the malaria drug mefloquine. This observation hints at the possibility of devising malaria treatment regimens that combine three or more drugs to exploit opposing resistance-susceptibility attributes.

In addition to NIAID and WTSI scientists, the team included investigators from the National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and from Mahidol University in Bangkok, Thailand.

R Amato et al. Genetic markers associated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia: a genotype-phenotype association study. Lancet Infectious Diseases DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30409-1 (2016).

Rick M. Fairhurst, M.D., Ph.D., Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, NIAID, is available to discuss this research.

Content last reviewed on November 3, 2016