Calling for Reinforcements: A New Way to Recruit Immune System Helpers Could Lead to Better Flu Vaccines

NIAID Now |

Calling for Reinforcements: A New Way to Recruit Immune System Helpers Could Lead to Better Flu Vaccines

Each year, flu causes hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions of hospitalizations worldwide. Although the best way to protect against serious illness is annual vaccination, the influenza vaccine’s effectiveness is far from perfect. In the past decade, CDC estimates of flu vaccine effectiveness have ranged from a low of 19% to a high of 48%, spurring calls for development of more effective flu vaccines. Now, NIH-funded researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have taken a new approach to crafting flu vaccines that resulted, both in mice and human tonsil tissue, in a more broadly protective immune response compared to currently available flu vaccines. The studies were led by Mark M. Davis, Ph.D., and the findings appeared in Science.

The trouble with current vaccines

Currently, flu vaccines are formulated annually to contain up to four strains of human influenza virus that are predicted to circulate widely in the coming season. For example, the 2024-2025 seasonal flu vaccine contains two strains of the influenza viurs A subtype and one of influenza virus B subtype. Each virus strain includes a viral protein called hemagglutinin (HA) that the virus uses to attach to and enter human cells. The immune system recognizes and responds to components of a virus or a vaccine—the antigens—by generating protective antibodies and T cells. On exposure to the flu virus, a subset of flu-specific T cells, called CD4+ helper T cells, provides signals to generate and activate antibody-producing B cells. Ideally, a swarm of HA-matched antibodies is produced following vaccination and will protect the vaccinated person from infection by flu virus strains represented in that year’s vaccine. However, each person tends to make a strong response to only one or a few of the vaccine HAs, leaving them vulnerable to other flu virus strains they may encounter. This phenomenon is known as subtype bias. 

Original antigenic sin

Subtype bias has long been explained using the evocative term “original antigenic sin.” It holds that the first influenza antigen a person is exposed to skews all future antibody and T cell responses towards that antigen. If original antigenic sin correctly explains subtype bias, then the outlook for improved, broadly protective flu vaccines is dimmed. But what if that explanation does not accurately account for subtype bias? Then perhaps there might be ways to overcome it. Dr. Davis and his colleagues set out to see if this was possible. 

The investigators first looked at patterns of subtype bias in two groups of study participants: 78 identical twins and 15 very young “influenza naïve” infants (who repeatedly tested negative for flu exposure during the study). Among the twins, 77% displayed bias for one flu subtype. That is, they preferentially made strong antibody responses to just one flu subtype in the vaccine, in preference to the others. The same preference for one subtype over the other three was seen in 73% of the influenza-naïve infants, suggesting that an individual’s genetic make-up likely plays a bigger role in driving subtype bias, although initial virus exposure also has some effect.  

Overcoming bias and calling in more helpers

Can subtype bias be overcome? The team explored that question in their effort to get B cells to make antibodies against all the HAs included in seasonal flu vaccines. Instead of using a mixture of four separate flu virus strains (each possessing a different HA antigen) as is the case in standard flu vaccines, Dr. Davis and colleagues synthesized a small molecule consisting of a single scaffold backbone to which all four HAs were then attached, forming a multi-antigen construct containing equal amounts of each HA protein.

These heterologous HA antigen constructs are small enough to be taken up by B cells, which then digest the HAs and display small pieces of them on the cell’s surface where it draws the attention of CD4+ helper T cells. These helper cells aid in turning the B cell from an antigen-displaying cell to an antibody-producing cell. Ordinarily, a B cell will ingest and display pieces of just one HA antigen and get assistance from only a subset of helper T cells. In contrast, Dr. Davis and his colleagues found that when a B cell ingests the coupled heterologous HA construct, it displays components of all four HA antigens and can engage a wider population of helper T cells. Those helper T cells can interact with a wider range of B cells leading to production of more antibodies against all four HA antigens.

Dr. Davis’s team then conducted a study in mice showing that the heterologous four HA antigen vaccine limited the subtype bias that prevailed when animals were immunized with a flu vaccine made in the standard way. 

Tonsil tissue 

The investigators next tested the four-antigen coupled heterologous HA construct in human tonsil tissue obtained from tonsillectomy surgeries. They processed the raw tissue into small fragments that in culture dishes form multicellular structures called organoids. These organoids have structural features and functional capabilities similar to tonsils, lymph nodes, and other lymphatic tissues where T and B cells interact. When exposed to either standard inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine or to a mixture of HA antigens, B cells in the tonsil organoids produced antibodies in a subtype-biased manner. However, cultured organoids that were stimulated with the heterologous four HA antigen constructs produced higher antibody responses against multiple flu subtypes. The organoids also generated more activated CD4+ helper T cells when stimulated with the coupled HA antigen construct relative to that seen with standard inactivated influenza vaccine. 

From these experiments, the scientists concluded that, “coupling heterologous antigens may broaden T cell help and improve vaccine efficacy. This strategy to augment T cell help is readily applicable to vaccines for other pathogens where multi-strain coverage is needed.”

Reference: V Mallajosyula et al. Coupling antigens from multiple subtypes of influenza can broaden antibody and T cell response. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adi2396 (2024).

Contact Information

Contact the NIAID Media Team.

301-402-1663
niaidnews@niaid.nih.gov

Search NIAID Blog

Contribute to Development of a Universal Influenza Vaccine

Funding News Editions:
See more articles in this edition

NIAID issued a Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): Advancing Research Needed to Develop a Universal Influenza Vaccine with the aim of continuing to foster new and innovative scientific endeavors related to Universal Influenza Vaccine Research that advance the three major research areas defined in our Strategic Plan for the Development of a Universal Influenza Vaccine

  • Improve understanding of transmission, natural history, and pathogenesis of influenza virus infection. 
  • Characterize influenza immunity and correlates of immune protection. 
  • Support rational design of universal influenza vaccines. 

Background and Research Objectives 

Vaccines remain the greatest public health tool to protect against influenza illness and disease. However, to more effectively protect the public against seasonal and pandemic influenzas, improved vaccines with broader, more durable protection are needed. To directly address this need, the NOSI is requesting grant applications proposing scientific projects in areas that include, but are not limited to: 

  • Expand understanding of how viral, host, and environmental factors contribute to viral transmission. 
  • Define the role of anti-hemagglutinin (HA) stem and anti-neuraminidase (NA) antibodies in prevention of transmission. 
  • Identify factors associated with the severity of influenza. 
  • Precisely characterize circulating influenza viruses to assess the breadth of protection required from vaccines. 
  • Improve understanding of antigenic drift and immunodominance of various influenza antigens. 
  • Investigate interrelated roles of T and B cells in influenza responses to vaccination and infection. 
  • Characterize immune responses in diverse populations (including but not limited to different ages, sex, pregnancy, obesity, presence of co-infections or other comorbidities, and compromised immunity). 
  • Identify factors that determine immunodominant hierarchies of B cell responses. 
  • Characterize antibody responses to HA and NA and their contribution to immune protection. 
  • Define how the initial encounter with an influenza virus (i.e., immune imprinting) affects B and T cell responses, including immunologic responses to subsequent influenza virus infection. 
  • Identify major influenza epitopes that elicit broadly protective T cell immunity. 
  • Determine T cell effector function(s) necessary to enhance protective immunity or to modulate disease severity. 
  • Determine whether T cells require localization in lymph nodes or mucosal tissue to be protective. 
  • Rational design of new immunogens, and mechanistic characterization of vaccines with greater breadth and durability than currently licensed vaccines. 
  • Utilize new vaccine approaches that elicit both humoral and cell-mediated responses. 
  • Employ novel delivery mechanisms or vaccine regimens that result in improved mucosal or tissue resident responses. 
  • Incorporate novel adjuvants, with a specific emphasis on combination adjuvants and mucosal adjuvants, to enhance vaccine responses. 
  • Test controlled-release vaccine strategies to improve the breadth and durability of vaccine responses. 
  • Develop animal models to test T-cell targeting vaccine platforms. 
  • Compare data from human challenge studies with data from studies of natural infection. 
  • Utilize existing datasets from human cohorts and animal models to better predict protective responses to infection and/or vaccination.

Application and Submission Information 

This notice applies to application receipt dates on or after February 5, 2025, and subsequent receipt dates through November 16, 2027. 

Submit applications for this initiative using one of the following notices of funding opportunities (NOFOs) or any reissues of these announcements through the expiration date of this notice. Your budget and project period limits will be determined by which NOFO you select for your application.  

For funding consideration, applicants must include “NOT-AI-24-081" (without quotation marks) in the Agency Routing Identifier field (box 4B) of the SF 424 R&R form. Applications without this information in box 4B will not be considered for this initiative. Refer to the NOSI for additional instructions. 

Direct scientific questions to Dr. Jennifer Gordon at jennifer.gordon2@nih.gov or 301-761-6805 or Dr. Kentner Singleton at kentner.singleton@nih.gov or 240-669-5499.

Contact Us

Email us at deaweb@niaid.nih.gov for help navigating NIAID’s grant and contract policies and procedures.

Scientists Developed a System of Organoids That Can Model Activity in B Cells

Duke Human Vaccine Institute to Develop Avian Flu Vaccine Protecting Against Variants, Provide Long-Lasting Immunity

Media Type
Article
Publish or Event Date
Research Institution
Duke Human Vaccine Institute
Short Title
Duke Human Vaccine Institute to Develop Avian Flu Vaccine Protecting Against Variants, Provide Long-Lasting Immunity
Content Coordinator
Content Manager

Key Influenza-Severity Risk Factor Found Hiding in Plain Sight on Our Antibodies

Single Mutation in H5N1 Influenza Surface Protein Could Enable Easier Human Infection

A single modification in the protein found on the surface of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 influenza virus currently circulating in U.S. dairy cows could allow for easier transmission among humans, according to new research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and published today in the journal Science. The study results reinforce the need for continued, vigilant surveillance and monitoring of HPAI H5N1 for potential genetic changes that could make the virus more transmissible in humans.

Contact

Submit a Media Request

Contact the NIAID News & Science Writing Branch.

301-402-1663
niaidnews@niaid.nih.gov
All Media Contacts

UGA Partners with FDA to Test U.S. Dairy Supplies for Avian Influenza

T Cells May Offer Some Protection in an H5N1 “Spillover” Scenario

Bovine H5N1 Influenza from Infected Worker Transmissible and Lethal in Animal Models

High vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) Recipients

This is a phase II, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing two doses of high-dose-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-QIV) or two doses of standard-dose-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-QIV) in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.