International Research in Infectious Diseases (R01, Clinical Trial Not Allowed)
NIH published this notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) RFA-AI-23-023, International Research in Infectious Diseases (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) on April 14, 2023.
Updated April 25,2025. We updated the answer to question two.
The overall goal of this program is to support high-priority, regionally relevant infectious disease research by international investigators in resource-constrained countries. The scope of the program is sufficiently broad to cover the full range of infectious disease research topics including (but not limited to) tuberculosis, malaria, HIV/AIDS, parasitic diseases, vectors and vector-borne diseases, drug resistance (antimicrobial and/or insecticide), zoonoses with public health consequences, and other emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases that are of public health significance. Such studies may be proposed on any aspect of infectious diseases research (except clinical trials), including (but not limited to): basic biological studies of pathogens and vectors; the epidemiology, natural history, pathogenesis, immunopathogenesis of infectious diseases; epidemiologic studies to define the incidence, clinical presentations, and outcomes of diseases; identification of resistance mechanisms and patterns; characterization of susceptible cohorts for a particular pathogen; pilot and feasibility studies in preparation for larger studies.
Applicants proposing HIV/AIDS studies must address NIAID Division of AIDS Priorities.
Note: While clinical studies are allowed, NIH-Defined Clinical Trials are not.
While a letter of intent is not required, it is strongly encouraged as it helps NIAID estimate the number of applications to be reviewed and plan accordingly. Find general information about Letters of Intent.
In the letter of intent, you should include the following:
- Descriptive title of the proposed research
- General information about the PI(s):
- Name, address, email, etc.
- General information about the participating institutions:
- Name, address, etc.
- Title and number of the funding opportunity announcement:
- International Research in Infectious Diseases (IRID)—RFA-AI-23-023
Submit the letter of intent by email at least 30 days prior to the application due date to:
Soheyla Saadi, Ph.D.
Telephone: 240-669-5178
Email: saadisoh@nih.gov
Applications proposing non-AIDS related research are due by 5:00 p.m. local time on August 2, 2023.
Applications proposing AIDS-related research are due by 5:00 p.m. local time on August 2, 2023.
Note: Local time refers to the time at your institution.
Find subsequent deadlines in the Key Dates section of the NOFO.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to apply early to allow for adequate time to correct any errors found in the application during the submission process.
All requested funds, including the budget in the application, must be stated in U.S. dollars. NIH funds foreign grant recipients using direct deposits through the Payment Management System (PMS). When the recipient draws funds from PMS, the system converts the amount from U.S. dollars using the most current exchange rate. Check the NIH Grants Policy Statement for additional information. Recipients should contact the Payment Management System (PMS) regarding drawdown requests, cash management rules, and disbursement of funds.
1-877-614-5533 (PMS Help Desk)
301-443-8362 (fax)
Email: PMSSupport@psc.gov
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) institutions are provided a flat rate of 8 percent of modified total direct costs (all requested costs except for tuition and related fees, direct expenditures for equipment, and subawards over $25,000).
Indirect costs for U.S.-based sub-awardees will be paid at the federally negotiated indirect cost rate.
Learn more about expenses and indirect costs in the Facilities and Administrative Costs section of the Receiving and Spending Money for International Grants page. Also learn the Difference Between Allowable Direct Costs and Allowable F&A Costs.
Yes. All institutions proposing human subjects research must have an active FWA number prior to award. For human subjects research, an institutional review board (IRB) or independent ethics committee (IEC) act to ensure protection of human subjects involved in clinical research. Check Institutional Review and Federal Wide Assurance for additional information.
Institutions proposing vertebrate animals research must include a Vertebrate Animals Section (VAS) in the grant application. The PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals requires that an approved Animal Welfare Assurance (AWA) be on file at the time of award for all organizations receiving support for research using live vertebrate animals. Before award, domestic institutions must have IACUC approval and foreign institutions must comply with the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. Check Research Using Vertebrate Animals and Foreign Assurance for additional information.
Key personnel are individuals who contribute intellectually and substantively to the research program. They contribute to the scientific development and/or execution of a project. Key personnel contribute a specified level of effort (in contrast to other significant contributors), even if no salary is requested.
PD/PI(s) are always considered senior/key personnel and are always named in the Notice of Award (NoA).
Note: All senior and key personnel need an eRA Commons ID to apply. Check NOT-OD-21-109, Expanding Requirement for eRA Commons IDs to All Senior/Key Personnel for additional information.
A panel of reviewers composed of experts in relevant fields will consider each of the following review criteria:
- Significance
- Investigator(s)
- Innovation
- Approach
- Environment
The reviewers will also consider other NOFO-specific questions that may apply specifically to this NOFO as outlined in Section V, including the following:
- Significance: Does the application adequately demonstrate that the scientific question is of interest to the region in which the research will be conducted and important from a global health perspective?
- Investigator(s): Is the research team, as proposed, likely to increase scientific capacity in the country/region related to the proposed subject area?
- Approach: If proposed, are plans for collaboration sufficiently developed? Is there likelihood that proposed collaborations will advance the development of local scientific expertise or increase collaborative research capacity at the local site?
Find more general information at Understand the Review Process.